Even though Brandon doesn't know me, I'm his hero!
(Here's why!. Fair warning, you'll probably find it offensive. On several levels. :)
Yeah, I can be a bitch sometimes, but this was so called for. This girl is 27 and writing to her "boy friend" in misspelled chat-speak. (And has her LJ name set as "*.:~:.*dahling*.:~:.*". Among other things, which I'm sure you can find for yourself.)
(Here's why!. Fair warning, you'll probably find it offensive. On several levels. :)
Yeah, I can be a bitch sometimes, but this was so called for. This girl is 27 and writing to her "boy friend" in misspelled chat-speak. (And has her LJ name set as "*.:~:.*dahling*.:~:.*". Among other things, which I'm sure you can find for yourself.)
no subject
Date: 2001-10-03 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-10-03 06:29 pm (UTC)I wonder how it feels to be fighting a battle on princple when you're on the wrong side?
..probably "geez, what an Asshole y doesnt he chill????!! LOLOLOLOLOL"
no subject
Date: 2001-10-03 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-10-03 08:05 pm (UTC)On a Freespeling note, there are more flaws in that argument than I care to consider, most especially--unless you can convince everyone to freespel everything the same (unlikely, since it says not to strive for consistency, and everyone -would- be choosing different phonetics), it will be chaos, with everyone trying to spell things their own way, making dictionaries (among other texts) next to impossible to create. You'll spend half your time trying to figure out what people are trying to say phonetically, before you can actually consider content. Consistency makes communication possible.
I understand that the goal is to add to the English lexicon all of these phonetic spellings, but I still find it basically flawed.
Another false point they mention on that page is that "Shakespeare was a freespeler before writing got fossilized".. no, not really. He was writing in Old or Middle English (I forget which), which was common at the time and has now evolved into modern English.
From my own experience, a) "Unconventional" spelling means "wrong", b) people are resistant to change, and this is trying to change a long-seated establishment that probably can't change. Language reflects culture, and currently culture seems to want the language pretty much how it is.
...he picks on the California state flower, which has a Latin name.
All in all, it seems like an excuse for literacy.
Re:
Date: 2001-10-03 08:14 pm (UTC)i do prefer language that is obviously deliberate and intentional - it is one thing to make an intentional mistake for the purposes of personal preference (such as my occational lack of uppercase letters), versus st00pid kRaD spelling.
Either way, i wasn't very impressed with what she wrote, and even if it had been free of errors, i'd have skipped right over it as i do most of the web garbage i see.
no subject
Date: 2001-10-04 05:23 am (UTC)Other than that, I agree with you... phonetics are a hideous way to try and formalize spelling. Try reading anything written in dialect for a good example of why (Faulkner, Joyce, etc...)
Usage does not dictate rules. Rules dictate usage.
no subject
Date: 2001-10-04 09:37 am (UTC)Besides, I -like- the English language as it is. Even if plenty of people can't be bothered to learn it well.
no subject
no subject
Date: 2001-10-03 10:14 pm (UTC)I have, however, raised quite the ruckus in that thread.. several of my friends, as well as some of their friends, have joined the fray. :)
*grin*
Date: 2001-10-03 11:34 pm (UTC)Re: *grin*
Date: 2001-10-03 11:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-10-03 11:57 pm (UTC)"and when he came to the place where the wild things are they roared their terrible roars and gnashed their terrible teeth and rolled their terrible eyes and showed their terrible claws till max said "be still!" ...and [they] called him the most wild thing of all and made him king of the wild things.
"and now," cried max, "let the wild rumpus start!"
*grin*
no subject
Date: 2001-10-08 12:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-10-08 04:51 pm (UTC)